Uk Law Weekly

  • Author: Vários
  • Narrator: Vários
  • Publisher: Podcast
  • Duration: 64:53:49
  • More information

Informações:

Synopsis

A weekly podcast on recent legal decisions and news.

Episodes

  • Sadovska v SoS for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 54

    27/11/2017 Duration: 09min

    What is a sham marriage and how can we define it for the purposes of the law? In this episode we explore that question as well as the fate of a woman who has lived in the UK since 2007 but now faces deportation after being accused by immigration officers of engaging in a marriage of convenience. Music from bensound.com

  • McDonald v Newton or McDonald [2017] UKSC 52

    20/11/2017 Duration: 07min

    The concept of matrimonial property was shaken up in the context of Scottish divorce law by the Supreme Court in this case. In particular the Justices had to make a decision about what proportion of a pension could be included and what it meant to be a member of a pension scheme. Music from bensound.com

  • R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51

    13/11/2017 Duration: 09min

    In 2013 the government introduced fees for people bringing cases before the employment tribunals in the UK. Although this would remove some of the burden on taxpayers, UNISON argued that the Fees Order prevented access to justice and acted in a discriminatory manner towards women and other minorities. In this episode we consider the decision in the light of access to justice and the wider constituitional implications on the rule of law. Music from bensound.com

  • Bonus Episode - Aslam v Uber [2017] Employment Appeal Tribunal

    11/11/2017 Duration: 07min

    In this special bonus episode we review the recent finding of the Employment Appeal Tribunal against Uber and consider what this means for the company as well as the so-called gig economy in the UK.

  • Khuja v Times Newspapers Ltd [2017] UKSC 49

    06/11/2017 Duration: 08min

    One of the most delicate balancing acts that occurs within the realm of human rights law is between Article 8 (the right to private and family life) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the UK this has allowed for the development of a common law right to privacy but how far can this extend when it interferes with the reporting of public legal proceedings? The issues in this case also raise wider questions about the allegations of sexual assault that are currently hanging over Hollywood and Westminster and these implications are discussed in this episode. Music from bensound.com

  • Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly and Company [2017] UKSC 48

    30/10/2017 Duration: 10min

    When Actavis took a new medical treatment to market, Eli Lilly thought it looked familiar. They had their own product that had been patented and the one from Actavis was only a slight variation. In this episode we explore the issues that arose surrounding intellectual property law and consider the wider implications when it comes to tightening or loosening the European patent system. Music from bensound.com

  • Walker v Innospec Ltd [2017] UKSC 47

    23/10/2017 Duration: 11min

    Walker has been in a same-sex relationships since 1993 but because he retired before civil partnerships became legal in late 2005 his partner was not entitled to the spousal pension. In this case Walker challenges the discrimination by reference to the EU's Framework Directive. We then discuss how rights may continue to be protected in the UK after Brexit. Music from bensound.com

  • RFC 2012 Plc v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45

    16/10/2017 Duration: 09min

    The financial dealings of Rangers Football Club have been subject to a great deal of scrutiny in the recent past and in this case the Supreme Court focused on one particular aspect of the way that the club was run. When a footballer signed for the club they were offered the chance to avoid paying income tax by using a complicated trust mechanism. In this episode we unpack that mechanism and consider the legal arguments that allowed the system to be abused. Music from bensound.com

  • Lord Advocate (Representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities) v Dean [2017] UKSC 44

    09/10/2017 Duration: 10min

    Zain Dean is a Scottish citizen who had been living in Taiwan for 19 years when he was convicted for manslaughter in 2010. While he was on bail he absconded back to Scotland on a friend's passport. When he was eventually caught the Taiwanese authorities sought to extradite Dean back to their country but an appeal was raised against this on the basis of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (prohibition of torture). In this episode we not only examine the human rights arguments but also consider the wider issue of extradition in the context of international relations. Music from bensound.com

  • R (Kiarie and Byndloss) v SoS for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42

    02/10/2017 Duration: 09min

    The Conservative immigration policy of 'deport now, appeal later' was part of their manifesto and found its way into law as part of a drive to protect the public from foreign criminals. In two cases where human rights issues were at stake this law was challenged on the basis that it is very difficult to conduct an appeal from abroad. In this episode we also consider the judgment in the context of wider immigration policy and the methods employed by the Home Office in its pursuit to address immigration to the UK. The Lawyer Who Takes The Cases No One Wants - Aida Edemariam https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/14/the-lawyer-who-takes-the-cases-no-one-wants Music from bensound.com

  • R (A and B) v Sos for Health [2017] UKSC 41

    25/09/2017 Duration: 11min

    Abortion is a controversial subject in Northern Ireland and is only available in a narrow range of circumstances. This means that a lot of women have to travel to England where they can pay for an abortion. In this judicial review case A had travelled to Manchester and paid £900 for an abortion but argued that, as a resident of the UK, this should have been made freely available to her on the NHS. While this case was, in theory, only about NHS policy it has wider ethical implications and also tells us a lot about devolution in the UK. Music from bensound.com

  • R (Coll) v SoS for Justice [2017] UKSC 40

    11/09/2017 Duration: 12min

    There is often very little thought that goes into what happens to people once they leave prison and this is especially true of women. In this case Ms. Coll was required to live in approved premises that were more than 50 miles away from her home and family. Her judicial review challenged this on the basis of the Equality Act 2010. In this episode we also examine the way that women are treated within the criminal justice system in general. Music from bensound.com

  • King Edward VI College v Hartley [2017] UKSC 39

    04/09/2017 Duration: 07min

    When a group of teachers at a sixth form college in Warwickshire went on strike their employers were entitled to withhold a proprtional amount of pay. For the college this was based on the number of working days in the year but the teachers argued that the correct calculation should be based on the total number of days in a calendar year. As the Supreme Court came to a final decision in this case they made reference to an 1870 Act of Parliament called the Apportionment Act. In this episode we also discuss the role that the law has to play in labour disputes in general. Music from bensound.com

  • The Lehman Brothers Case [2017] UKSC 38

    28/08/2017 Duration: 09min

    On 15th September 2008 Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and became the most high profile casualty of the financial crisis that rocked the global economy. Nearly a decade on and the repercussions are still being felt in the legal and political climate. This case in particular looks at the administration and liquidation of Lehman Brothers International Europe through the eyes of insolvency legislation in the UK. Music from bensound.com

  • Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd [2017] UKSC 37

    21/08/2017 Duration: 06min

    Whn it comes to statutory interpretation there are rules that the courts have to follow but the situation is less clear for interpreting non-statutory texts such as frameworks and guidance. In this episode we explore the method that should be adopted by judges and how they have to tread a fine line between interpretation and policy. Music from bensound.com

  • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v EnergySolutions EU Ltd [2017] UKSC 34

    14/08/2017 Duration: 08min

    When a public body undertakes a procurement exercise it should be carried out in an open and transparent fashion that is fair to all of the bidders. In this case the process was not carried out in the correct manner and this presented the Supreme Court with a number of questions about when and how a case may be brought. In this episode we also consider just how effective the EU's regime in this area really is. Music from bensound.com

  • Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood [2017] UKSC 33

    07/08/2017 Duration: 08min

    Under the current regime of the Access to Justice Act 1999 a publisher can be liable for costs arising from a defamation case even where those costs include premiums associated with conditional fee agreements and after the event insurance. In this case three publishers challenge the law as an infringement on their right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. In this episode we also consider proposals to change the law and also press regulation. Music from bensound.com

  • McCann v The State Hospitals Board for Scotland [2017] UKSC 31

    31/07/2017 Duration: 09min

    The Scottish smoking ban in hospital grounds has been a source of contention since being passed by the Scottish Parliament and in this case we see a challenge from a detained mental health patient. The ban in this instance also invovled searching for and confiscating tobacco and so the case reliednot only on domestic legislation but human rights grounds as well. Music from bensound.com

  • SXH v The Crown Prosecution Service [2017] UKSC 30

    17/07/2017 Duration: 06min

    When SXH came to the UK as an asylum seeker she arrived on a false passport. The Crown Prosecution Service decided that it was in the public interest to pursue a prosecution under the Identity Cards Act 2006. Further research into SXH's case changed their mind but in this case before the Supreme Court she argued that the original decision was a breach of her human rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Music from bensound.com

  • Isle of Wight Council v Platt [2017] UKSC 28

    03/07/2017 Duration: 06min

    When Mr Platt took his daughter out of school during term time for a holiday in Florida he was landed with a penalty notice from Isle of Wight Council. The case made its way up to the Supreme Court and garnered national headlines as the following question had to be decided: what does it mean to attend school regularly? Music from bensound.com

page 17 from 20